Part of a series on |
Eastern Christianity |
---|
Eastern Christianity portal
|
History |
Orthodox Church History Asian Christianity Coptic Egypt · Ukraine |
Traditions |
Orthodox Church Others: Oriental Orthodoxy Ethiopian Tewahedo Church Coptic Church Church of the East Eastern Catholic Churches Syriac Christianity |
Liturgy and worship |
Sign of the cross Divine Liturgy Iconography Asceticism Omophorion |
Theology |
Hesychasm · Icon Apophaticism Filioque clause Miaphysitism Monophysitism Diophysitism Nestorianism Theosis · Theoria Phronema · Philokalia Praxis · Theotokos Hypostasis · Ousia Essence vs. Energies Metousiosis |
Polycrates of Ephesus (flourished c.130 - 196) was an Early Christian bishop who resided in Ephesus.
Roberts and Donaldson noted that Polycrates "belonged to a family in which he was the eighth Christian bishop; and he presided over the church of Ephesus, in which the traditions of St. John were yet fresh in men's minds at the date of his birth. He had doubtless known Polycarp, and Irenaeus also. He seems to have presided over a synod of Asiatic bishops (A.D. 196) which came together to consider this matter of the Paschal feast. It is surely noteworthy that nobody doubted that it was kept by a Christian and Apostolic ordinance. So St. Paul argues from its Christian observance, in his rebuke of the Corinthians. They were keeping it 'unleavened' ceremonially, and he urges a spiritual unleavening as more important. The Christian hallowing of Pentecost connects with the Paschal (Passover over Easter) argument. The Christian Sabbath hinges on these points."1
Polycrates is best known for his letter addressed to the Roman Bishop Victor who was attempting to find a consensus about the proper date to celebrate Easter, see also Quartodecimanism.
The Church historian Eusebius wrote,
Here is what Eusebius records that Polycrates wrote,
Pope Victor attempted to cut off from the common unity Polycrates and others for taking this stance, but later reversed his decision after Irenaeus and others interceded2. It is unclear what happened to Polycrates after his letter.
Polycrates' letter has been used as proof against the argument that the Churches in Asia Minor accepted the authority of the bishops at Rome.